I would like to start this blog entry by offering a visual metaphor. The image of which you see below this paragraph. It is a sphere that has two ridges running across its surface, dividing it into three separate areas. On this sphere there are tiny observers, if one is close enough to one of the ridges, (s)he can see some of what happens on the other side of the ridge, but not all, due to the curvature of the sphere. Large parts of areas (also in the ones in which the observers are present) remain invisible unless (s)he is prepared to move in time and space. What exists and takes place in the other areas is even less known about by the observers, unless a ridge is crossed. Only taking distance from the sphere allows to obtain a broader perspective. And only when time (inside the still remaining spatial dimensions) stops all can be known.
Observers close to a ridge have some knowledge about what goes on on the other side, but it inherently implicates they know nothing about what goes on in the third area, unless they bother to move towards it. Observers around the center(s) of any of the areas, who do not move a lot, have knowledge only about what they are capable of observing within the scope of their sight and other senses. So these 'sphere beings' that are for some reason stuck to the surface of the sphere only have partial knowledge of what takes place on that surface. Apart from that surface the sphere also has an inside and a surrounding in 3 dimensional space and linear time. Things could be - and probably are - taking place there as well. Living on top of a boundary area allows to observe what is also present on it including what is above it within the reach of vision.
The sphere beings physical and mental properties are predominantly tuned to the existence of objects on the surface of the sphere. Existence inside or outside (and detached from) the sphere is at best possible only when the beings possess tools and devices that allow them to exist in the different conditions present in- and outside of the sphere. The ability to build contraptions capable of allowing sphere beings to travel beyond their natural habitat, requires knowledge. If that knowledge is correct, they may survive journeys into other places and times, if the knowledge is incorrect they will die. Knowledge acquired, is added to the scope of consciousness of which, according to Carl Jung, there are three levels as shown in the graph below.
As I mentioned in
an earlier blogpost, in the movie 'Lucy' it is admitted that we have no clue what the human mind is capable of when it is capable of using in excess of 60% of its brain capacity, which is expressed in more or less similar numbers as consciousness percentages. That makes sense, since what we're currently clueless about what currently is in the unconscious volume. When that should one time occur, however, what is now unconscious will by that time be within grasp of the human mind. And when it does, it may open the portal to universal knowledge (which is infinite).
Knowledge is used to form consciousness, but has an ambiguous relationship to it; a large amount of knowledge does not necessarily play a role in the expansion of consciousness. It depends on the data and nature of the knowledge acquired. Its nature determines the nature of the consciousness that it contributed to shape. Wisdom must contain knowledge of good and evil in order to gain the ability to discern between the two. Before Eve ate from the apple and persuaded Adam to do the same, human supposedly did not possess the ability to make this distinction (the biblical tale of course is a metaphor conjured by those living in a certain point in time and space). This event may have caused humankind to shift from one time line to an other. Had it not taken place, man may have continued to exist in total ignorance of evil. But since it did occur, evil forces no longer were able to easily hide from human perception and perpetuate whatever it is that the do. On the new time line man began to have an understanding of dualistic realities. Truth on one end and lies on the other end of the spectrum. According to
The Unity Process website they can be represented in formulae:
The confusion about the relation between having knowledge and being conscious has a reason that apparently is scarcely known. Dr. Pete Petersen may have a view on this matter that could lead to a more profound insight in cause of this common misconception. He says that there is a difference between the Consciousness Field and the Information Field. The latter is strongly related to knowledge. After Adam and Eve ate the apple they began to have knowledge of good and evil. With knowledge consciousness is built. Without knowledge there can be no consciousness. Knowledge has to be acquired first, before one can build a consciousness. Very clever people have calculated that the universe can store 10
123 or 10
90 bits in approximately 10
80 atoms. As I have tried to explain in
my previous blog entry, matter is mostly (if not all) space. So information is stored in space, not in matter. Space is omnipresent in the universe; it is the omnipresent Information Field. Mind you, information can be true or false - existence may have the purpose of determining the nature of information.
When using current, officially recognized science as a template, some phenomena can not be explained, like why are the centres of sun spots black instead of white (where they are supposed to be hottest) and why are some planets revolving in the wrong direction around their star (according to the standard model). When using the theory proposed by the scientists involved in the
Electric Universe website, these anomalies (which is what they are called now) can in fact be explained with their diverging but logical view, while their alternative theory remains applicable for the rest of the universe. The only reason 'traditional' science still remains the commonly accepted measure of things, lies in the fact that too many careers depend on it. But the knowledge constructed in those circles is nothing but one compiled by sphere beings as described in the beginning of this article.
And then there is the matter of alternative dimensions and different time lines. It is somewhat explained in more or less common language
here. Bearing in mind what I wrote in an earlier
blogpost, that everything is energy - wave forms - rather than actual matter, it makes sense to assume that a frequency change is capable of changing what is perceived as reality by life forms that are present in a particular field of frequencies. This is what earthly life forms do:
experience the reality or field of frequencies in which they live. The frequencies themselves are generated and tuned elsewhere. Man has arrived at a point where (s)he thinks he can alter frequencies to an extent that it allow him or her to enter a different universe by creating a portal. It is the basic goal of CERN, although never publicly admitted. The recent
explosion in that facility gave rise to suspicions that there is a lot more going on at CERN than is supposedly known, even in academic circles.
Concerning the assumption that there are in fact other universes, the
hypothesis of Dr. Brian Greene is interesting. He arrived at the conclusion that there was much more energy at the time of the big bang than there is present in this universe. It leads him to think that there are many more universes than this one that we live in. The complex of universes is called a multiverse. That train of thought complies with the (dubious)
many worlds theory and the conclusions of the Copenhagen conferences, even if science is quibbling over the fact which of these interpretations best suits their theories. It is what one would expect in a dimension of paradoxes and limitations.
If, referring to the article in the previous link, there are such environments as alternative universes where there is no disease, famine, and suffering, it implicates that this universe tin which we live with wars, famine, violence and a plethora of misconceptions, is actually manipulated by a force beyond our imagination. Most people choose to ignore and discard this assumption because it doesn't snugly fit in their
comfort zone or
realm of induced consciousness. But the proof is right under their noses; there is a huge measure of unnecessary violence and suffering that could easily be resolved with the
assets that are already present, even if they are carefully hidden. It requires a small fraction of the funds stashed in those of ledge accounts to resolve poverty, environments pollution, stop wars and violence etc., but the will to do that in leading factions in this world prevents it from taking place.
Those people that hide behind the veil, live on a different time line inside this universe. If one wins the American lottery of 400 million USD, it will take the winner into a different time line in the blink of an eye - from rags to riches in a second. But (s)he will still live inside this violent, unfeeling universe and most likely be tempted to participate in events that never would have been part of that person's life had he or she stayed poor. Events that would never have been part of his or her imagination before winning the lottery. The people responsible for building CERN were aware of this, which is what made them build the facility. It was their projected escape route should things not go as they had planned.
What they planned, I described in yet
an other blog entry before this one. The transformation of human (and animal) life, often called transhumanism, would allow the (self) chosen ones to rule this world in any way they see fit without opposition. So they seemed to have all options covered; there was no way they could lose. At least that is what they thought. But as I wrote before: the frequency field in which life forms exist, is not generated and manipulated in this realm. Other entities or systems are in control of that. Favouring one person or group over the other is always going to lead to unpleasant situations, which is something true intelligence understands. It may lead to the situation in which it appears to be one and the same as love. The only condition for a sustainable environment.