Matters of the Mind V

The property of proof is overrated. The only department to which the human race has ascribed the capacity to prove things is science. If it is not proved by science, it is commonly considered to be untrue of disputable at best. Science due to humankind's limited abilities to perceive and interpret is based on assumptions (hypotheses) that no one in the world can prove is true. Secondly, when scientists run into areas that screw up their theories, they simply add more assumptions to make theories hold up, after they have stopped panicking. The disturbing discoveries are swept under the rug and they all agree never to mention the unsettling finds again, so that their self-proclaimed position of authority in the realm of the general public, their funders and associated misinformed entities remains unaffected.

The (in)famous human conjuring of Renormalization, Dark Matter and Einstein's Field Theories that can not deal with quantum gravity are just a few of the hallucinations that should make every being with more than two properly functioning braincells suspicious towards the class of mainstream science. Those cluttering up this planet who actually have more than two adequately serving braincells who dare questioning established theories are banned from the scientific plane, cut off from funds and sometimes even shot through the head to make sure they do not confute mirages that are wrapped in complex calculation and inexplicable jargon of which even smart people not belonging to the scholar world understand nothing whatsoever.

If there is no prefix to your name that indicates you have spent years to comply seamlessly with the inventions of the top guns of the official intellectual circles (circus), then whatever you say that is related to the scientific delusions, is discarded off hand. You are not one of them, you are not smart enough buy whatever crap they are selling.

Personally, the conduct of mainstream science weakens my sphincters, to express myself in correct terms.

Proof has never proven to be proving anything at all. It is the proverbial wheel within a wheel that was spawned by factions that created hierarchical structures in order to allow themselves to have privileges thereby depriving everyone else from whatever is considered to be of value. Cliches like 'everyone is equal' and 'everyone has the same rights' are continuously proving themselves to be disturbingly hilarious and untrue. I for one am pleased to feel that I am unique, not like or equal to anyone else in this dimension. Therefore it also pleases me that I have an opinion that does not quite comply with (induced) general consensus.

If you think science is not exactly interested in pursuing the truth, then don't even consider exploring the workings of official, organized religion...Religion by nature never provides proof; it simply demands you to believe what it claims to represent and stand for. It is extremely difficult to find any construction worse than that, even on this abomination ridden planet. If anything, religions have proven to cause disagreement, violence, corruption, decadence, perversity and profound deceit.

All I want to do in this blog entry is to prove that proof means nothing.

I don't feel the urge to prove that; proof itself proves time and again that it proves nothing. It only allows me to feel free to think anything I like at any time in any place. I would like people to share this freedom that is a birthright, inherent to your being. A universal prerogative extended to you long before you came into this realm and intended to be yours long after you leave this physical plane.

Anything a sincere compassionate being feels or anything a ruthless criminal feels, is equally necessary in this space and time, just because it is possible. Human civil law only serves to maintain the corrupt hierarchical structure to which all humans are submitted (forced to submit). The underlying Maritime Law that the powers that be prefer to hide from the general public, is one step closer to the universal truth, but also not proven in any instant and place. Yet it is the implicit legal structure on which the human sense of what is right and what is wrong is based. It is explained in meticulous detail in Manly P. Hall's magnificent work that is called 'The Secret Teachings of All Ages' that you can download and study by clicking this link.

By the way, the copyright of Hall's document was not extended, so downloading and having the document in your possession and studying is not illegal. Not even in the frame of corrupted civil law. The purpose of me mentioning Maritime Law it is the business of the legal trade - lawyers, judges and courts - to prove a person, company or organization of any kind guilty or not guilty of a legal charge submitted by the plaintiff. If you study the above document and watch the video clips on Admiralty Law, then ask yourself: What is it exactly that they prove? Are the various courts entitled to judge based on civil law? And what are the roles of those gathered in court for a particular case?

Whatever you may think the LAW incorporates, UCC is ruling you. It is directly based on Vatican Canon Law. Whether you agree or not, it applies to you in this world. You can not prove that this is not the case, not in or outside of court. So it does not matter if the keepers of the law can not prove that it legally applies to you...

Now prove to me that proof has any value. Whatsoever. Have a nice day!