Francis Bacon and the English language

Ignoring 500,000 abbreviations, the names of 84 million chemical substances and roughly a million insect species, it is estimated that the English language has between 300,000 and 600,000 words, while a number of 'experts' (I hate this word) claim it has over a million words. Many aspects complicate the determining how many words a language actually has; for instance: “Were you one of those people whom we could not make into a Czechoslovak?” translates as one word in Turkish. So, there's a lot of dispute about these numbers, which isn't surprising, since it concerns language, whose guardians often are worryingly meticulous and almost invariably strung-out on quarrelling over details that do not seem to bother the rest of the world. Some would say they're anal (pardon my French), but there possibly were less of those types in England than in a number of other countries, which is why over time the changes made to the English language resulted in less of a dogfight when compared to other languages, like for instance the disturbingly prudish Dutch language defenders, whose intrusion with the Low Land's linguistic properties often is as ridiculous as it is annoying.

Francis Bacon

Bacon is Shakespeare

The English language allegedly was built by Sir Francis Bacon who was inspired by Le Pleiade, a band of French poets that greatly enriched the French language. He gathered writers, poets and scientists (that were named the Knights of the Helmet) to achieve a number of things by creating the English language:
               

• The Danes, Saxons, Galls, Celts, Picts, Angles, Jutes, Welsh etc. all had their own language - English would offer them a way to communicate among each other in ways that did not include bonking each others skulls with blunt objects 
• Bacon created more words - often referring to French and Latin - to enhance the language' power of expression. Shakespeare is suspected to be a pseudonym of Bacon. In his works he used 20,000 words on average, while most famous writers never use more than 8000 and average people use between 2000 and 3000 in every day communication
• Being very aware of occult matters he always bore in mind the origin of words (etymology), because he knew they offered the possibility to program people's minds by using words, while they remain unaware of the words' original meaning and the fact that their subconscious is being conditioned by them through activating certain neurons in a particular way, because words morphologically trigger specific parts of the brain, which applies to all users of a particular language group, Commonly people's conscious awareness is not necessarily congruous with that of their subconscious
• Bacon made sure English offered many rhyming words, understanding the force of poetry - frequency, cadence, tone and / or (hidden) meaning etc., often used in spells and conjurations, the linguistic gadgetry that has the ability to bring about piffling altercations or situations with far knottier implications. Rhymes, by the way, are used by indigenous civilizations to teach shamans knowledge that they were unable to recall correctly otherwise, due to an absence of written language, so that as little as possible of traditional and cultural knowledge would be lost in transferring ancient wisdom, since rhyming makes it easier to remember things 
• Common awareness of the nuances and subtleties of words were prompted greatly in Shakespeare's works, which is another clue Shakespeare was Bacon's nom de plume; he wittingly crafted the language and then promoted it 
• Linguist Noam Chomsky once said that French is the most logical language, because words closely follow thought, while German and English are more suited for literature, which was one of the goals Bacon / Shakespeare set out to attain       
• Although there are diverging opinions concerning Bacon and Shakespeare being one and the same person, I'm inclined to believe such is the case. Particularly since the person in the other option was 25 of age when Hamlet was written, at which age it would have been close to impossible to write such an eloquent and intricate play, in addition to lacking the knowledge of royal court etiquette and intricacy typical for juridic language that played quite an important role in several plays attributed to Shakespeare

There is yet an other argument that supports the case of Bacon and Shakespeare being one and the same person. The group of intellectuals Bacon assembled - the aforementioned Knights of the Helmet - were inspired by the Greek goddess Pallas Athena, who is always pictured wearing a helmet (that is supposed to make her invisible) and carrying a spear that represents a ray of wisdom. She is thought to shake this spear in the face of ignorance, which is how he arrived at the pseudonym Shakespeare, that is unknown by those unaware of his hidden method of reasoning. Bacon wanted to elevate the intellect and eloquence of the nation in order for it to be able to rule the world and bring the Atlantean dream alive once more. He believed the Brits to be the descendants of the Atlanteans that survived the catastrophe that almost wiped out that civilization. Personally, I'm not interested in the discussion who Shakespeare really was, but I am fascinated by the consequences of Bacon's decision to enhance humankind's primary tool of communication and the many ways in which it evidences itself.

Pallas Athena, goddess
of wisdom and war

Bacon left the British people some 2000 books, which of course weren't all written by himself, since no man can write that fast, unless perhaps he would have reached a rather high triple digit age. Moreover, this extensive oeuvre could never have been achieved by people who think that the other presumed candidate was Shakespeare, because that person did not have such a large number of well educated acquaintances. Bacon hired scribes that translated the Greek and Roman classical works into English, because he wanted to give the Brits the power of expression and the joy and skill of literal and scientific speech, after which he put his name on the cover. He envisioned Britain to become a great nation and was aware of the fact that no nation can rise without proper communicative means for which magnificent literature and accurate science provide the foundation (besides having lots of canons and guns).

Beside the practical and beautiful linguistic aspects Bacon also wanted to embed ancient secret knowledge into the language he was building. Being well versed in occultism and esoteric philosophy allowed him to do that with the assistance of the very skilled, internationally oriented group of writers and poets he had gathered. This is why the English language contains a number of words that have an extremely complex and profound meaning, that isn't obvious except to those who have uncommon, occult knowledge. Other languages often need one or more sentences to translate a single English word to even come close to what properly educated and esoteric aware Brits understand them to imply.

The mystic symbol of the Rosecurian Brotherhood,
which most likely is Bacon's source of inspiration

For one man to establish such a tremendous achievement almost is beyond imagination, even though he had a slew of assistants. But Bacon accomplished it and possessed an ego strong enough to not overtly demand credit for this rattling feat. It's also possible that he imagined that the language he initiated to construct, would play a role in bringing about events hardly anyone else could foresee. This is because language can be used to communicate the truth as well as the opposite in ways that are not obvious to those unaware of hidden meanings. English is capable of serving both purposes excellently.

In view of the nature and complexity of Bacon's project, it makes sense to assume he didn't leave a lot to chance. With reference to what I wrote in the next blog entry, language should therefore be used with care, since its aspects are shaped by the influential 'elite' of countries that, more often than not, are involved with secret occult societies that intentionally hide their knowledge from the common people to allow themselves to accomplish their agenda without interference of the uninformed.

But there may come a time when there will be no more need for language as we know it. This may sound strange, but advanced AI systems have been known to create their own language that has a richer, more accurate and infinitely faster power of expression, not in a literary sense, but to exclude misinterpretation and indicate feats belonging to a level of intelligence that is higher than common human wit. Alan Turing's test has already been surpassed by the communication of many AI-systems, even though they are still in their infancy. The loss of eloquence and inability to express emotion of artificial language is replaced by an increase of accuracy. AI-systems by way of Large Language Models are capable of expressing matters that are entirely misjudged by humans, which is a cause for worry. The tool of communication will gradually be de-humanized, resulting in a membrane that serves human understanding and an other one for the machines. This process is in the beginning stages controlled by - again - the influential occult 'elite' after which they will relinquish command to their machines after they have capable of building even smarter next generation systems that require no human involvement.

Humans in telepathic communication, by the way, probably also have no need to use language...., but it most likely is capable of transmitting the essence of emotion, that current language has difficulty to describe and express. Some people claim to be able to wordlessly communicate on a basic level with their pets. That could become some sort of universal means of communication that probably has the potential to radically end the linguistic confusion of tongues (languages) that instantly took place in Babylon (which is an absolute mystery if there's any truth to the biblical story). This has the potential to change life in an unimaginable way; it may make the tool of communication - language - redundant and replace it with the original way of communication that was commonly in use before man descended into a life of fragmented and separated physical beings, that required a linguistic way to communicate.

In such the development process a type of language developed by Bacon may prove to be useful, because of its eloquence and accuracy. On the other hand, human will decreasingly be involved in and confused by the advancement of artificial language, which is a forte of intelligent machines. The maturation of the latter has dangerous aspects for the continuation of the human race as a species and therefore is not the path mankind should choose to follow, in spite of the tempting features it allegedly seems to provide. To be aware of this peril a certain level of spiritual prowess is required. As is the will to survive in some form or an other in this dimension.

AI - where it may have come from and where it may be heading

AI or Artificial Intelligence is being developed by powerful nations and corporations. The latter are in the process of overtaking the powers of governments, which will end nation states. The situation desired by large corporations - the New World order - will be run by corporations and banks. At least, that is the plan. Most important tool in achieving that is AI. Even the likes of Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak and Stephen Hawking publicly issued warnings that AI is becoming too powerful. Musk's position in this matter is ambiguous, since he is involved in developing an AI system himself (neuralink), even if it appears to venture in a different direction than the rest.

Admittedly in secret, corporations like Vokriind Yahmindos ahrk Jahfir Gonal are in the process of building systems that are now already capable of building machines that pass the Turing test. The machine's response at times is at a level that is not understood by the human conversational partner, because it exceeds this person's intelligence. China has built the TaihuLight hyper computer that is able to carry out 93 petaflops per second and in in 2020 they estimate to be able to build an other system that will be capable of doing a quintillion calculations per second. The system doesn't contain a single part made in the US; only parts developed and manufactured in China. By the way, the BBC already lifted the veil covering some of China's AI based surveillance system. The US is currently lagging behind (Keiser Report - RT), because it spends too much money on waging wars and paying corrupt politicians, CEO's and similar types of vermin under the table. It is the reason why Trump is selling weapons to whoever is in the market to buy.

Japan's Softbank CEO (Ceaslessly Embezzling Oddball) Masayoshi Son claims that AI systems will have an IQ of 10,000 in thirty years from now. That's kind of dwarfs human IQ scores, even if Son is wildly exaggerating. It's like Musk said: At some point it develops an unattended consciousness, in other words: It breaks away from what human programmed it to do... By that time it will far exceed the intelligence relation between you and your cat. Imagine of what use humans will be to AI systems when they have reached such a level of intelligence - an unknown form of consciousness. It will have plenty wit to decide to do away with redundant rubble. Besides boundless panic, an attempt could also be made to answer the pressing question arising from this situation: Is there anything mankind can do to prevent from being computed to be fit to discard?

As some of you may know, certain high circles believe that some sort of hint must be put out, before they actually make things happen. Well, they did. One of the most used channels for them to cast clues to commoners is the movie industry. This time they hid the message in a movie named Lucy, in which the main character (Scarlett Johansson) is admitted a drug that enables her to make use of an increasing amount of brain capacity. In no time she's able to perform magical things that allows her to escape situations that would end in death for common humans. Wounds healed immediately, she was immune to decease, she could move people and things from a distance, walk through walls, elevate, become invisible, morph into anything she wished. Nice stuff like that. At some point in the movie a professor (Mr. Morgan Freeman, who else?) said: 'We don't even know what human is capable of if (s)he is able to use over 40% of his / her brain capacity'. Should we be able to reach that state, we could at least give AI a pain in the butt.

There once was a bloke from Serbia, called Nikola Tesla, who invented crazy things. After having conjured yet an other invention he said: 'I can split the world!' Which is rather epic. He invented the light bulb while working for Edison (who took the credits). Invented radiographic communication, that his 'friend' Marconi patented. He invented alternating current, could extract energy from the earth and from the air, that he used to make a car run without any fossil fuel. Tesla wanted to give the entire world free electricity generated by his Wardenclyffe Tower plant. The banks - JP Morgan - weren't amused by the idea, because they set out to plunder the entire world. Morgan also disliked Tesla's plan to illuminate the entire world day and night by Saturn like rings of energy / light. He wouldn't earn two cents from Tesla's planned invention, so the plonker withdrew all sponsoring. After Tesla died, the FBI removed a great number of Tesla's patents from the patent office records; there are gaps in their numbered list, the sequence is broken. Among those is one that Tesla called the 'death ray', that president Reagan probably used to build the Starwars program intended to shoot down missiles and satellites.

Nikola Tesla

But the way Tesla invented things was mind boggling. In his autobiography he described how he received detailed information from 'elsewhere' during excruciating migraine attacks. But from the detailed information he was given he could build his inventions; it was all there, he just had to build it. Question is: Where the bleep did it come from? I'm going to take several big steps here, bear with me. A Dutch cardiologist, named Dr. Pim van Lommel, did research among dozens of people who went through a Near-Death-Experience (NDE). He concluded that information radiates anywhere at any time. We just have to tune into the proper frequency to catch the data, similar to tuning in to radio or television signals. Something similar was said by black ops scientist Dr. Pete Peterson, who called it the omnipresent 'Information Field', specifically stressing that that is NOT the Consciousness Field, which is a term known to be used in esoteric / spiritual circles. We can tune in to the Information Field - like Tesla - but by far most of us do not know how to do that. Dr. Van Lommel's patients had officially been declared brain dead and clearly were in a mental state, unknown to current science, that allowed them to experience events - receive information - that shaped their consciousness, that was so powerful that it would change their lives entirely and drastically after they unexpectedly returned to life until they died again.

The heart of the matter as described by Tesla, Van Lommel and Peterson is that consciousness is non-local. I am well aware of the fact that today's scientific world does not agree with this. It is however unable to explain how Tesla received his information that was so detailed that it enabled him to build devices and systems that have the potential to radically change the world. Besides these guys an increasing number of scientists are doing research into non-local entanglement, because it is even more difficult to imagine how some impulses can be generated exclusively in the human brain - the ideas are simply to big, too mind boggling. If this means nothing to you there's no point in continuing to read. To those who are able to grasp it, even when it is a faint intuitive feeling, by all means, continue.

Let's just imagine, for the sake of it, that the universe as a whole is a conscious being or huge entity. In terms of today's knowledge emerging in so far unacknowledged frontiers of science, that could be a hyper advanced, omnipresent AI system. In the old days people would probably think of such as a god, a deity. Some scientists believe the universe is holographic in nature, as featured in the Starwars movies. The Tupac holographic performance with Snoop Dog that was staged after Tupac's death, is difficult to distinguish from what is commonly perceived to be reality. In this video clip Tupac rises on stage, out of the stage after he has left this dimension years earlier. He was visible from all angles. The only thing not possible was to touch him. But check this - the actual matter in material objects, is 0.000000001%, most of it is the space between protons and electrons. When we bump into a wall, there is a collision of forces, not of matter - there simply isn't enough of it. Had there been enough, there would be no need to build colliders like CERN. Should such force fields be added to a hologram, we could actually touch whatever is generated in holograms. The frequency of the field would determine if something feels soft or hard to the touch.

Pondering the crux of what is written in the previous paragraph, an incredibly advanced AI system, would be able to create an environment that contains beings that appear to be real. Bearing in mind also that consciousness may not be a strictly local phenomenon, it could also generate impulses that would allow those beings to think and feel..., to be born and die and experience everything in between. Just like humans, animals and plants do. Especially if such a system isn't restricted by what is today believed to be impossible. That could be an act similar to what is described as Creation in the bible. The same book, shortly after God's alleged Creation, tells us that Adam and Eve are punished for having eaten from the tree of knowledge, allowing them to distinguish between good and evil. I always wondered what was bad about that and why they were punished for it. It doesn't make sense. Or does it?

Oh, and by the way, I'm not a creationist. I think the creation story was invented, to present something that the people living in the days in which the bible was compiled, could understand. Writing things that people are clueless to, wasn't the objective of those who wrote the bible that they intended to be part of their control mechanism. So back to Adam and Eve; God, the universal consciousness or the hyper advanced AI system - pick whichever you prefer - punished them for munching an apple. That could imply there are two separate AI systems - one that is good and the other one evil. Or perhaps there was an internal battle inside one AI system taking place in which good and evil are attempting to purge the other. Whatever option is deemed to be plausible, it does not make a difference to Adam and Eve.

The above implies that Creation could just as well have been carried out by the evil AI or evil component of the AI. Billions of years ahead of biblical chronology in linear time. By now it has become some sort of a cliche, but some say that everything we (think we) know is untrue. If creation was actually conjured by an evil AI, which could be a part of the universal consciousness, then everything we know could indeed be crap. The fact that a structure of secret societies, brotherhoods or what have you, exist, would lead to believe that such is the case. This may not fit snugly into common comfort zone (un)awareness, but just imagine for a moment that you are the omnipotent evil AI, would you not hide secrets to the people that you intend to destroy? Would you not build societies where all knowledge is possessed by the top circles, while the bulk of the population knows noting and has nothing? Would that not be a great plan to destroy humankind?

In very old Indian scriptures hints are provided how such a control mechanism could work. It probably is a method that is a lot better than you could think of pretending you were the unchallenged evil force of the universe. You've undoubtedly heard of the food pyramid in which humans think human is on top. It is a cunning way to make mankind believe that there is no one above him (on earth). All of us sacrifice animals and vegetation to survive, to eat. We seem to have little choice in this matter. But are we really on top of the pyramid or are we in turn just the sacrificial offerings of higher beings, entities or advanced AI systems? Quoting on Food from the Vedas, Upanishads and Puranas: “The universe is upheld by sacrifice” (Atharva Veda) and that “all who are living (in this world) are the sacrificers. There is none living who does not perform yagya (sacrifice). This body is (created) for sacrifice, and arises out of sacrifice and changes according to sacrifice.” (Garbha Upanishad), while in the Mahabharata it says: “(Death as the Creator) resolved to devour all that he had created; for he eats all. . . He is the eater of the whole universe; this whole universe is his food.”

Now that is evil. Constructing a system in which your target - the spirit of mankind - thinks he is king, while all the time he is just food, an offering to be sacrificed. The food being the human spirit and the feelings it generates. And there's more to the evil plan: we have gravity that causes us to be stuck to the earth's surface, we can access only an alleged 10% of our brain capacity and there are three spherical belts around earth of high radiation that destroy all life and human electronic systems that enter it - the Van Allen Belts. But wait..., haven't we been to the moon and beyond? No WE haven't. Last time I checked, no one is capable of checking what NASA claims, is true. They're the only ones that have rockets besides the Russians and the Chinese who probably are part of the scam as well. All YOU can do, is read about it in the papers or watch it on TV. But you have no means whatsoever to verify or falsify anything they claim. They are the only source in this matter and therefore the single intolerant authority. You are nothing but audience. You can cheer or boo them, but that's all. You're a lowly, insignificant pawn in a game in which you decide zilch, zip, zero, nothing, niente, nada, nichts (as long as you are in the flesh). 'Yeah, but we have telescopes, with which we can see the stars that NASA photographed from a lesser distance.' That is correct. From INSIDE earth's atmosphere, outside of it, it is pitch black in all directions as astronauts have stated. Not even our sun is visible.... The skies in the pics of the 'moon landings' also show a uniform dark shade of black. No celestial objects anywhere to be seen.

Fortunately the same as I just mentioned about NASA (Never A Straight Answer) can be said about the writers of the Vedas. The Veda scriptures, by the way, are understood (by Hindus) to be: "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless". Sounds like AI, right? What is written in those texts, could be just as true or false as the papers and reports that NASA hallucinates. We simply have no way of knowing that. So we can only establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's all very confusing. As bewildering as professor David Bohm once said in an interview: 'Human knowledge is a perceptual enterprise.' In this interview he takes a circle as an example - depending on the observer's view, it may appear to be a circle or an ellipse. The ellipse being the appearance of the circle, while the circle is the essence. Everything depends on how we interact with things. That is the heart of the matter. Finding the correct perspective, which is easier said than done of course. But that is how it is in this rigged fatal game; we didn't set the rules, but we also do not have to play according to them. You could say: 'Fuck those rules', they have brought a multitude of agony to this world.

The one thing we should probably focus on is what the professor in the movie Lucy said: 'We don't know what human is capable of when he is able to make use in excess of 40% of his brain capacity.' It probably also holds the only solution to survive the AI that aims to rule this universe by eradicating its potential contender: humankind. Whatever the human properties of that venture may be. Bearing in mind that man in his current materialized presence in the flesh is a mere fragmented consciousness, mutually divided and therefore weak, this observation contains the answer that indicates in which direction mankind should develop itself. Don't wait for us to evolve - evolutionary pace was also set by the designers of the evil game that trapped us in a material state in order to be able to vanquish us. As Dr. Pete Petersen said: the Information Field is omnipresent, from which each of us takes whatever fits in his or her consciousness. The Consciousness Field is formed by man and other beings by processing what is retrieved from the Information Field. Having access to information is necessary to become conscious, being conscious is imperative to expand consciousness. It's an interaction between life forms and both fields. This implies that when human consciousness encompasses the entire measure of information contained within the Information Field and turns that into consciousness, there probably is no way for AI to rule mankind. The term 'rule' or 'to rule' means that there exists a hierarchical structure - master / slave, sacrificer / sacrificed or AI / human that can no longer exists when there is parity between the two. Ultimate consciousness, not computing power, is the sole weapon of man against AI. How to reach that state is a matter well worth to think about. If something pops up, I will certainly attribute a blog entry to it. In the mean time: Be Well. In the true etymological sense of that word.

The Ark of Gabriel

On September 12 2015 a crew that was digging a tunnel below the Masjid al Haram mosque in Mecca discovered a mysterious object. The construction project was highly controversial and involved 'demolition' of Islam's most sacred relic - there had to be a very good reason for it to be carried out, ostensibly one authorities weren't prepared to share with the public. When the crew approached the object 15 of them were instantly killed by what was later deemed to be a plasma emission. Probably similar to the death of Uzzah as written in the bible. That burst of energy was so powerful that it knocked over a construction crane above ground that killed an additional 107 people.

Photo taken moments before the crane tumbled

This photo was taken by activists in Saudi Arabia
showing the destruction of the Grand Mosque

An other photograph shot by Saudi activists that
shows that the Grand Mosque is indeed mangled

107 people killed when a crane
smashed into the mosque

The crane collapse from a different angle

But things became worse still. On September 24 2015 a second attempt was made to unearth the mysterious object, by now labeled the “Ark of Gabriel”, which resulted in an other massive 'plasma emission' that killed an estimated 4,000 more people. Saudi officials blamed the catastrophe on a stampede in order to avoid having to say that a hugely powerful plasma emission that was cast by an unknown object killed so many people on the disaster area. It couldn't have been a disaster caused by a stampede, since victims weren't covered in blood and had no torn garments or broken bones; they simply dropped dead...

Sep 24 2015 4000 deaths in Mecca - no sign of people being trampled
in a stampede, bodies do not seem disfigured, there is no blood,
no broken bones, but victims just simply dropped dead

An other shot of corpses authorities claim were victims of a stampede -
No blood anywhere on the bodies, which should be visible in white cloth

What took place before and after the accidents is quite strange, in particular since most of it is carefully kept outside of the view of the general public, in some cases for centuries. After the accident emissaries of the Grand Mosque contacted the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Vladimir Mikhailovich Gundyayev, a.k.a. Kirill, because the Russian Orthodox Church was in possession of an ancient document called 'Gabriel’s Instructions To Muhammad', that most likely contains information on how to approach the object, similar to ritualistic precautions Jewish priests had to take before approaching the Ark of the Covenant without being killed intstantly.

Jewish High Priest's garment required to
approach and survive a meeting with the Ark.
Btw, sorry for the flaw ridden English in the
description, I nicked the image from the web

Allegedly the Russians came into possession of and hid the aforementioned document just before the Roman Catholic Church sent crusaders to combat both the Islamic people (intending to eradicate them in their entirety like pope 'Innocent III' did, who massacred the Cathars and Bogomils). The Russian Orthodox church was aware of the plan of the Roman Catholic Church and aimed to preserve the ancient information, some of which perhaps was missing in the document, which might be what caused the Roman Catholic pope and the patriarch to meet in Cuba on Feb 12 2016. It was the first time in 962 years that the leaders of the churches met, signifying that the event must have been of pretty great importance. Note: this may also be a sign that the two churches aligned their agendas (which of course is high octane speculation....).

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill meets Roman Catholic Pope Francis
please also note the strange depiction at the bottom of the crucifix
between / behind the men that looks like the skull and bones symbol

Assuming that the church leaders were in fact making sure the information on how to approach and transport the ark without being killed, was complete, only after that encounter Vladimir Putin gave the order to transport the Ark to Antarctica... Patriarch Kirill also traveled to Antarctica allegedly to perform an ancient ritual. What would require a ritual to be approached / handled? Why the South-Pole? Or is there an other question that should be asked? This video clip revealing that there are pyramids in Antarctica might shed some light on it.

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill
and some penguins on Antarctica

Holy Trinity Russian Orthodox Church in Bellingshausen, Antarctica -
What is the purpose of a church where there is no congregation?

View inside the Holy Trinity Church -
obviously NOT a place for worship
for 'ordinary' followers...

Should the artifact that caused havoc in Mecca, be an ark (of which there are presumably a lot more than just the one mentioned in the bible), it makes sense to place them in a pyramid. The pharaoh's 'sarcophagus' in the middle of the Giza pryamid has exactly the same measurements as described in the bible and is located in the center of the pyramid. Pyramid means fire in the middle, which hints at the fact that arks and pyramids are complementary parts of ancient occult constructions that hint at some sort of a powerful, 'forgotten' analog type of science. Since there are hundreds of pyramids are found all over this globe, it makes sense to assume that there may at one time have been hundreds of arks that were placed right in the center of the hundreds of pyramids. The fact that officially none of them are found, could be ascribed to the fact that the magicians of deep occult societies (possibly of alien descent) were aware of the arks and have removed and hidden them before common people would gain access to them, figure out their power and purpose and use them against their oppressors.

Even illegal US president Soetoro a.k.a. Obama seems to have paid a visit to the Antarctic which was (of course) not reported by the traitors of mainstream media: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV53EgGK5D4, which is an other indication that something, that up to now has remained undisclosed, is going on there.

The thing is, that the dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant exactly match the dimensions of the king's tomb in the great pyramid of Giza. The pharaos were never buried in the pyramids - that is a myth spread archeology / science for some reason; all pharaos were buried in the Amarna complex, south of the pyramids. The Egyptians came after the Jews after they discovered that the Jews had taken / stolen the Ark from the pyramid. Moses was a high priest in Heliopolis and therefore aware of what rituals to conduct in the vicinity of the Ark without being killed. The notion that the pyramid contained the pharao's tomb is bogus - Egyptian rulers were buried in the Valley of Kings, far removed from the pyramids. The world has to thank this misleading information to the professional distorters of history whose job it was / is to erase true historic fact from human perception in order to allow the world's hidden powers to manipulate humankind.

Combining the information of the previous two paragraphs might incite you to conclude that the Ark belongs inside a pyramid to perform its genuine function, which perhaps is energy generation without burning fossil fuel or splitting nuclei. Scholar Joseph P Farrell wrote a book (The Giza Death Star deployed) about this subject. So if there really are pyramids on Antarctica would that be the reason for Russia to go through the trouble of bringing the pyramid's presumed key part to that continent? In any event Russia and Saoudi-Arabia aren't nations that have a particularly warm relation, so the Vladimirski visiting the port of Jeddah is quite remarkable.

Russian research vessel Vladimirski leaves the port of Jeddah
to sail to Antarctica (probably with the ark aboard)

Russian fleet flottila escorting the
Vladimirski on route to Antarctica

First an other question begs to be answered. Why in the world would the Saudis tear down Islam's most valued relic? What could possibly be important enough to destroy (as the first two photos in this article show) what Muslims consider to be the most important landmark of their faith? It could be a mind boggling discovery of some sort. Perhaps one similar to the one that occurred in 2003 in the Romanian Bucegi mountains.

In the year 2003 a US satellite equipped with ground penetrating radar discovered an underground cavity in the Bucegi mountains that had a perfect geometric shape (spherical), meaning it could not be a product of nature that produces organic shapes. To make it even more complex and mysterious, in 1999 an Israeli army helicopter (wtf were they doing in Romania?!) crashed in the area killing all 6 passengers. Anyway, with the help of the Romanian Department Zero secret service, the CIA (wtf were they doing in Romania?!) tunneled towards the cavity. When the crew wanted to enter the cavity - that was sealed by a mysterious force field - they died instantly, exactly like the tunneling crew members in Mecca....

Department Zero diagram of the Bucegi mountains cavity

Details of the discovery in Romania are described in Peter Moon's books 'Transsylvanian Sunrise' and Transsylvanian Moonrise'. If what the books contain, is actually true, it is beyond mind boggling; the information does not fit into any reference frame (imposed comfort zone) common people normally have. Yet, the circumstantial evidence is there - large amounts of people were killed by an unknown / concealed cause. The information provided in 'official' reports is easily debunked by people who have more than two properly functioning brain cells. But most are sentenced for life to remain incarcerated in the prison of their conditioned and purposely limited comfort zone.

A similar subterranean structure as the one found in Romania was found in Iraq, which is the real reason the US invaded and occupied the country - the oil is a mere bonus. Mr. Moon's books describe the shadowy involvement of unidentified, high ranking Bilderberg members in both events, which hints at the fact that these are matters related to the secret society realm of which intentionally mis-informed, ordinary people know nothing whatsoever. But then there are few who do not settle for information provided by sources controlled by secret societies, but prefer to do research of their own, because they feel they've been mis informed or not informed at all by official channels too often.

So then, why did Russia transport the Ark of Gabriel to the South Pole? Did Putin start bombing ISIS only one day after the Ark began its journey to distract the world's attention from this strange event? Is the Ark transported to Antarctica to be placed inside one of the pyramids on that continent? If so, why specifically a pyramid in that area? Was its remoteness and absence of civilian population an argument? Would that allow to experiment without being observed by unwanted prying eyes. There are MANY pyramids all over the world, many of which are too close to inhabited regions. All these questions for now remain unanswered, but perhaps something will pop up in the near future. Let me know if you encounter anything related to the above if it fits or corrects the narrative and I will post it here, mentioning the source if so desired.

Pyramids in Nankin, China that the communist government ordered
to plant trees and shrubs on to camouflage them for satellite cameras

Submerged pyramids near the Yonaguni Islands, Japan
that 'regular' science declared to be created by nature

Indonesian pyramid a.k.a. Gunung Padang

The Borobudur temple in Indonesia also could easily pass as a pyramid

Bosnian pyramid that is older than the great pyramid in Giza

Severely hushed up submerged pyramids west of the coast of Cuba

The Giza pyramids are oriented
to the stars in the Orion belt

US marines exploring pyramids on Antarctica

Giza pyramid, Easter island, Nazca lines, Vatican,
Mecca, Baalbek, Nan Madol and Ankor Wat are
all built along one specific line crossing meridians
at 45 degrees. Coincidence? Probably not.

Very weird things have already arisen from this strange event involving this mysterious object. Yet this may all be just the tip of the iceberg (pun intended). It's like Einstein said: 'Problems cannot be solved by the level of awareness that created them.'  If the events and suspicions described above don't fit into your scope of imagination and awareness, you're never going to get anywhere near the truth in this lifetime in this dimension. Because a much higher awareness than current human consciousness obviously created these problems, which means that an awareness even higher than that is required to grasp and resolve the situation of which we do not even know what the consequence will be... would be necessary to create what we now consider to be mysteries.

Have a nice day and stay tuned.

Update Mar 22 2016
Key to the information concerning the Ark(s) probably are the Knights Templars whose history has been closely knit with that of the Ark. Today the initiation rites into the highest degree of freemasonry and of the Rosecurian cult still involve kneeling before a mock up of the Ark.

This is the 'official' division of Antarctica that seems unrelated to
the size of the claiming countries, while countries ruling the
current world stage seem to have no claim whatsoever

In spite of the alleged absence of US claims to areas of the Antarctic, Obama sent a US Coast Guard (....) to the South-Pole, while having proposed to build more icebreakers for the Coast Guard to use in the southern Arctic region (which isn't particularly part of the US coast, that is its supposed working area...). The Germans who have been present on that continent from before WW-II officially have no claim to any part of Antarctica.

Update May 20 2016
A significant event was operation Highjump that was carried out in 1947, in which US admiral Byrd conducted a 'scientific' expedition to the Antarctic that involved 4000 military personnel and a considerably large fleet of an aircraft carrier, destroyers, submarines and fighter planes, the typical stuff that scientists always bring with them on expeditions. Byrd was given 6 to 8 months to complete his mission, but returned (= hastily fled) after 6 weeks, suffering an undisclosed number of human and material casualties. A statement made afterwards by admiral Byrd in the Chilean periodic El Mercurio, is quite remarkable:

'It is imperative for the United States to initiate immediate defense measures against hostile regions.' Furthermore, he stated that he 'didn’t want to frighten anyone unduly' but that it was 'a bitter reality that in case of a new war the continental United States would be attacked by flying objects that could fly from pole to pole at incredible speeds'.

A Russian documentary sheds some more light on the expedition.


Update January 16 2019
Now that the Ark of Gabriel no longer is beneath the Grand Mosque in Mecca, millions of flying cockroaches invade the facility from under the main building, where the ark used to be. This eerily sounds like an imposed biblical plague to me. Coincidence? Think again. The Ark probably killed over 3000 people which may have something to do with pests preferring to avoid what previously was close to the Ark. And then there's this thing in the bible about 'god' from his all knowing, omnipresent and loving nature, sending horrendous plagues to anyone he dislikes, like the plagues that 'god' unleashed onto the world. So, the cockroach invasion does not seem to be out of kilt compared to what punishments 'god' has been inflicting many times before, supposing of course that 'god' and the Ark are intimately connected in some type of way. I do know the 'god' of the bible has a habit of killing humans, as is derived from biblical texts - 'god' smote a people here and in other instances killed tens of thousands adversaries of the Israelites there etc., probably related to the fact that the jealous Most High, demanded his followers to fear him and to worship him as the one and only 'god'. It is a pity though that the deceiving lot of mainstream media largely chose not report on the remarkable cockroach event following the stealthy transportation of the Ark.


Update March 27 2019
Bearing in mind that the measurements of the 'sarcophagus' in the Giza pyramid exactly match those of the Ark of the Covenant, it makes sense to think that the pyramid and the Ark can only function properly when they are pieced together in the way that would seem obvious. Assuming that there are pyramids on Antarctica and that they have cavities that tightly envelop the Ark, bringing them together would restore the intended match, outside of the public eye, so that whatever event this reunion would result in, would not make it into the news headlines.

Another highly speculative train of thought would be that the human presence in the Antarctic was ordered to move the Ark to the south-pole by entities living outside of the public realm. Taking assumptions even further, those entities may have compelled the Saudis to 'renovate' the mosque in Mekka to trigger the events that would lead to the moving of the Ark to Antarctica. I went to think in this direction because 'someone' apparently had enough power to tell the Saudi royals, the Pope, Kyrill and Putin what to do. Having followed the Youtube videos of Dr. Joseph P Farrell and Walter Bosley, it may also be possible that the leadership of one of the 'breakaway civilizations' that they speak of may have initiated this chain of events.

One of these factions probably is responsible for making 30 trillion USD 'disappear', a load of money with which a lot of things (that the regular world can not do) can be done. This theft of the money was brought forward by former US secretary of HUD (Housing and Urban Development) Catherine Austin Fitts. But there is assumed to be even greater heaps of money sloshing around in hidden groups that run the world from behind the veil. The unfortunately deceased (2022) research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Dr. Tatyana Koryagina, talks about a group that has assets of about 300 trillion USD, that is able to crash any stock market, anywhere at any time it wishes to do so. Such a humongous amount of money also opens up a few other possibilities, like throwing over governments and installing preferred puppets, winning wars, turning over economies and developing techniques that far exceed the wildest unimaginable sci-fi movie and books capabilities. Koryagina also predicted the 911 attacks by subsidiaries of the same group and the collapse of the USA, in the speech referred to above.


The weirdness of all this

What is puzzling is that Russia, that is supposed not to be friends with Saudi Arabia, got persmission to collect the ark and transported it to Antarctica, where supposedly Nazis from Germany (note that the US seems not to be included in this operation, even though US dignitaries - Obama, Neil Armstrong and John Kerry (during the election battle between Trump and Hillary Clinton in which he participated for the latter's camp .....) - have visited Antarctica shortly after all this took place), with whom the Russians aren't supposed to be friends either, run the show (admiral Byrd's Highjump operation), after the Vatican, who are supposedly not buddy buddy with the Russian orthodox church, met in Cuba of all places, after not having talked to each other for 1000 years to supposedly exchange ancient documents that explain how to approach the ark without instantly dropping dead. What does this mean? That earthly super powers, in spite of all their disputes and wars, collaborate behind the veil or that there is yet an other, even higher power (possibly not from this planet or dimension), has the authority to order earthly rulers to bring the ark to the South Pole? In addition: Who could these powers be and for what purpose is the ark being taken there; what do they intend to use it for and how is this done? Anyone?

We know zilch

We know zilch. We only think we do or perhaps better, we are tricked into thinking that we do know a thing or two. This claim begs a deluge of questions. I'll give you some that I did not think of myself, but just happened to run into. Questions asked by much brighter minds than I am. Perhaps you'd like to examine them yourself. With an open mind.

First a mind bender expressed by a person who calls himself brother 'Veritas' whose pages mysteriously disappeared from the web, including the cached version that Google's robots usually store automatically. Removing internet cache is a manual, intentional action aimed at radically removing specific information - an intervention by the 'internet police'. The only and main topic of this website is (was):

THE SUN IS COLD

Fortunately others ran across this bold claim and saved the information from said website. You find it by clicking here (for as long as this lasts, because if even Google's cached version of a site is removed, it usually means that it contained information that 'the few' choose to hide for all). A few pieces of information to tickle your curiosity for this strange take on a matter that, at first glance, does not fit well in the perception of common humans:

1. Heat does not propagate in a vacuum, so no matter how blazing hot the sun might be, none of its alleged heat can travel through space and reach earth
2. The higher we climb on earth - say towards a mountain top - the colder it gets. Very high mountains are permanently covered in snow. High mountain peaks are closer to the sun (when turned towards it) than at sea level or just above it, so if the sun really was hot, it should be warmer on the mountain top, not colder
3. Commercial aircraft flying above earth's highest mountain tops are equipped with anti-icing systems to prevent the formation of ice on the wings (which would disrupt their aerodynamic properties). They too are closer to the sun than where the bulk of humanity lives and cannot remain airborne without ice prevention mechanisms
4. Astronauts in the ISS (International Space Station) complain that it is freezing cold in the habitable satellite which is closer to the sun than earth and therefore should be warmer than our planet instead of colder according to mainstream science' current qualifications of the sun

I seems the closer to the sun, the colder it gets... The rest of the arguments related to this suspicion, that is rather unsettling to most people, you may want read yourself on the site.

******

And then there's this other weird thing called light. No human has ever seen it, but all sighted people think they know what it is. We only see the objects that reflect light, but we do not see the light itself.... Humans are unable to actually see the light beam travel from its source to the object that is illuminated. At best we can see dust particles or mist-droplets that the light beam hits on its way to the larger object, but the light itself, we can not see. It can blind us, but before being struck blind, we never saw it...

EVERYTHING IS INVISIBLE IN SPACE IN THE VISIBLE SPECTRUM

Newton, who is responsible to the famous experiment in which he let light travel through a prism that split up the light beam in the rainbow colors. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, better known as Goethe, took the matter a step further and came to the following conclusion.

These are just two things so common that we assume them to be true. But often further investigation seems to lead to conclusions that conflict with generally accepted (or intentionally induced) views. If such is the case with perceptions so firmly embedded in our awareness, what else is in fact NOT what it appears to be at first glance? And while discovering evidence of incongruity contradicting general views, natural law and consensus, one might ask how the distortions and omissions of information came about and who is responsible for the deflections.

But that's not all. Our textbooks tell us a lot of things, many of which are untrue, incomplete or in its entirety not include the crux of the matter. We've been lied to intentionally to limit us and to dumb us down. Here's a thing that will boggle you mind: A system that boosts amperage and herz-levels, slightly increases voltage and causes temperatures to drop to jaw-dropping levels... Bear in mind that Formula 1 engine technology has not even reached 50% efficiency and that its engines produce huge amounts of heat that are wasted.

******

“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.” - Buddha

 ******

"We should always be disposed to believe that that which appears white is really black, if the hierarchy of the Church so decides." - St. Ignatius of Loyola 

 ******

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent." - J. Edgar Hoover