The deceit of cyclical processes

Cyclical processes indefinitely repeat rise and fall, never making real progress (=infinite progress) possible. They therefore are a perversion of anything good, even if they contain good elements that are deliberately put in place in an attempt to silence the opposition that disagrees with their pretended good nature and invented necessity of alternating rise and fall. When realizing the measure of agony and grief such type of processes cause, it becomes clear that their nature is not good at all and the decline-period inevitably is connected to imposed and unavoidable suffering. In addition, when things are on the rise too few benefit from it. These observations combined, qualify the cyclical nature of those processes to be evil to the core, while they carefully try to hide their real disgusting nature.

https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/samsara-hinduism

Immortality is non-cyclical
and allows infinite progress

History has produced an endless list of supposedly wise persons that were used to lead the gullible, misinformed and totally bonkers astray. Related to their cover-ups is the fact that many of these 'wise' of ancient times took great pleasure in asking less aware persons trick questions. Their own answers to these questions rarely contain comprehensive response that logically addresses the matter their question broughts up, because it exclusively is intended to make the one posing the question look superior while making the addressed feel stupid. Anyone that truly is superior does not need such vulgar chicanery. But if such phony wise people actually succeed in making others belief that they have great wisdom, they gain authority and as a result are perfectly suited to serve as a source of thoughts / ideologies / beliefs that merely serve to program other peoples minds. The confusion that the answers of the wise impose upon those to whom the questions are posed and those that observe the situation is intentionally invented - inducing confusion being one of the favorite tools of making people think that an illusion is real.

The would be wise ask an enigmatic question and answer it in riddles which further increases the level of confusion. Their audience does not dare to question their explanations for fear of being labelled retard, after which the answers of the wise settle in the minds of many (and often expand into systematic teachings), even if they basically are a shed-load of utterly senseless, invented bunk. Over the years mechanisms have been developed to protect the non-sense hallucinated by the would be wise; it is called MSM or mainstream media that is run by paid liars who inevitably label anything nearing the truth ' fake news'. To combat the persistent, argument producing prophets (a.k.a. whistle blowers) the CIA invented the term 'conspiracy theorist' when its job was (and still is) to suppress the truth concerning the assassination of John F Kennedy.

An example of the deception by the 'wise'

I am well aware that it's not a popular thing to do, to analyse the conduct of wise men whose reputation is believed to be undisputed by the vast majority of the people and conclude that the designation of their repute is based on erroneous interpretations. In this particular instance, as described below, Buddha revealed the dangers of Samsara - the cycle of death and rebirth. It is remarkable to say the least, that he did not put a greater emphasis, more often in more widespread settings on this matter in his communication with common people, since everyone will die and enter the afterlife. It feels as if not spreading this information intensely enough, relative to its importance and impact on the human spirit, is conspicuous conduct that conflicts with his carefully built reputation of love for humankind to say the least. Below is the dialogue started by Buddha himself:

Dear Bhikkhus (one who has renounced worldly life and joined the mendicant and contemplative community), between the amounts of sand on my nail and in the earth which one do you think is larger?”

The Bhikkhus answered that the amount of sand in the earth is billion or trillion times larger than what was on the nail of the Buddha. Then Buddha responded in a rather surprising way:

“Dear Bhikkhus, like the small amount of sand on my nail, only a small amount of humans will be born again as humans after they leave this life. But, many other like the amount of sand in the earth will be born in the great hell (Niraya - Hinduism tells of scores of different types of hell) after death. They pass away and are born in Preta world. After leaving the human world, they will indeed be born in hell. The amount of humans who would get a birth as a human again after they die is very small. The amount of humans who would get a birth in divine worlds is also slim.”

– Source: Pagnchagati Peyyala Vagga (S. N. 05)

The consequence of this teaching of Buddha is huge, assuming of course that what he claimed to be the truth actually is true. It makes one wonder why he spoke of this only very rarely to small groups of people, about the impact of Samsara that allegedly affects everyone. It sheds quite a nefarious light (or darkness) on what possibly is the real nature of this universe and Buddha's role inside of it. In the link below you see the Buddhist types of hell, to which Buddha referred, depicted in rather disturbing ways:

https://what-buddha-said.net/library/DPPN/n/niraya.htm

This is one of the Buddhist hells
that Buddha rarely mentions as a
destiny for by far the most humans - is
it not important enough for us to know ?
Why did he not shout it from roof tops?
And this was excluded by his 'enlightened'
peers throughout the history of man as well.

In the Tibetan Wheel of Life, Buddha visits hell and offers water to the damned to reduce their suffering, not to get them the hell out of there. It implies that no one is sent to hell for a reason, making it puzzling why Buddha leaves them to suffer - he only eases their suffering for a very short while and does not free them, after which he dashes off again, leaving them to rot in agony. The vast majority is in hell, while only very few make it into the Samsara cycle as Buddha himself told the Bhikkus in the paragraph above. This means close to ALL men, women and children are evil according to the Buddhist faith, which is something I absolutely and vigorously disagree with. Unless perhaps life on earth is the hell to which was metaphorically referred (which is hellish to far too many people, I admit).

What does this all mean?

From the above can be concluded that Samsara, according to Buddha, is some sort of prerogative reserved for only a few, that offers no long term reward. This makes Samsara even worse than commonly perceived - it offers no guarantee that presence in this cycle is a certainty (which implies staying out of hell), especially since the memory of previous lives is erased at each birth (which most definitely is NOT an act of kindness of a loving deity, but one of an utterly evil, twisted mind ! ! ! ). In addition, punishing people for mistakes they make as a result of an erased memory (that causes them to be without experience to use as a reference) is an other deviously planned evil act.

Those that end up in the Samsara cycle have probably managed (against all odds) to reach a certain level of awareness that prohibits them from being sent straight to hell. In their next life however, their memory of previous lives will be deleted again, which could well cause them to never reach the required level of awareness to enter yet an other Samsara cycle. This is evil beyond the capacity of words to express, hence very likely to be an iniquitous demonic invention - demons being cruel, ruthless entities from the lower Astral plane. If this doesn't ring a bell to you, you may want to educate yourself concerning the different dimensions mentioned in ancient scripts and the heedful venture of modern science that suggests other dimensions actually exist.

For those that go straight to hell, the situation is even worse; they weren't allowed a choice or opportunity whatsoever to determine their fate in this malevolent universe. Talk about über-anal, this is pure malevolent evil! More over, as I stated before in previous blog posts: Moksha is an escape from Samsara that allows access to a higher spiritual state. Note that any escape can only be done from an incarceration, which means Samsara is a prison! This nefarious deceit can never be the conjuring of some 'loving god', but the unjust and unfeeling sentencing by a powerful, evil demonic entity. And those that conceal the real nature of this universe behind a veil of pretended wisdom, are as evil as those that created it. The universal law of Karma will hit them with unprecedented and ever lasting ferocity, causing them to suffer a 1000-fold of anguish that they imposed to beyond enternity in all universes, all dimensions and on all timelines. There is no escape for them.

Cycles vs immortality

Observe that most spirits are sent to one of the many terrible hells, while few are caught in the Samsara cycle. This means that every spirit is immortal! No existence of any of us can indefinitely be terminated. But we can be forced to suffer excruciatingly or endlessly return to material life. Erasing memories of previous lives prevents us from gaining ever expanding awareness and thus reach a state of true wisdom. As a result the reincarnated remain retarded (as opposed to entities that are allowed to have infinite progress) and therefore never understand why they live in cyclical episodes.

In the Sumerian kinglist a king named En-men-luana is mentioned who ruled for 43,200 years! That was the duration of his reign only; he must have been even older than that incredible number. The number of burning candles on his birthday cake must have looked like a blazing forest fire. Some would be scientists claim his mentioned age was a mere allegory, but the Sumerian calendar is far more accurate than the Gregorian method of measuring time used today. In fact Sumerian time measuring is so accurate that NASA uses it to determine the best moment to launch their space craft. Just imagine what knowledge / wisdom En-men-luana had gathered during his extremely long life.... This today is impossible probably due to the engineering of our DNA, that is part of the Samsara plan.

So the throwing into hell and captivating in cycles of birth and death - the jailing of spirits in material existence - can only be created to never let us reach the unimaginably high levels that our true potential would enable. It would give humans godlike powers as suggested in the movie 'Lucy'. Only a horrendously evil being would invent and implement such an unspeakably heinous situation. Buddha probably knew about this, but for some reason chose not to inform the victims of this despicable evil. This disposition to protect the seclusion probably has the same origin as the secret societies, mystery schools and brotherhoods, which ultimately comes down to fear of retribution by the nefarious entity that created the miserable cyclical nature of this dimension.

And along with this 'enlightened' being the rest of his peers throughout history have done the same as Buddha. This provides an excellent argument not to fall for any of the bunk religions impose on the gullible believers. Just ask yourself why would religions have the urge to induce false beliefs into the minds of immortal spirits trapped in limiting material existence. Buddha perhaps unintentionally misspoke when he addressed the Bhikkhus, when he was overcome with an urge very typical for spirits caught in this fragmented and separated material world to show off his knowledge that he felt was greater than theirs. All religions and beLIEve systems are accomplice to the nefarious plan imposed by the dazzlingly evil entity that denies immortal spirits to enjoy infinite progress and instead traps them in the cyclical prison of life in matter. To hell with that bloke. To all the Buddhist hells with him in a never ending array of cycles.

The crux of it all is: Cyclical processes stand in the way of infinite progress (even if they are propelled through space and time). And they were deliberately put there to obstruct it. This villainous scheme will not go away as long as you continue believe that it is nature's way to arrange thing - it is NOT; It was invented to make you misinterpret everything - stop thinking that way! Cyclical processes mess up the existence of your immortal spirit; they can't terminate it, but sure as hell they can force upon you this wicked illusion that you are not immortal.

The privileged few of those that live now have been forced to like oppressing others, while the majority of the people have been forced to love being oppressed. In a crude way it resembles the animal kingdom in which predators are forced to kill prey in order to survive; the predators die if they don't kill prey. This is not a coincidence - nature was forced to be this way. But this type of nature isn't natural, it is a situation into which all life was goaded in order to suffer and endlessly return to the situation they fear most. From this questions arise: Who did that? And why? How is this done and is this crime committed by the supreme being of this universe or is this being a mere servant / adversary of even higher entities? And the most important question of all: How do we escape from this maximum security prison?

Infinite progress

Diametrically opposed to the evil cyclical incarceration described above, is infinite progress. That is a gift offered by a truly loving spirit. Longing for this wordlessly, will connect your spirit to this mind-boggling, never ending present of the greatest spirit in all universes. Any less capable spirit is not able to create such a brilliant eternal situation. Bear in mind that the limitation and paradox of this realm makes it difficult if not impossible to imagine such a situation, but that in no way means that infinite progress does not exist (as I may try to ponder upon in future blog entries).

Imagine this instead: if you would have told people 100 years ago about the possibilities of smart phones and artificial intelligence, they would probably have locked you up in the funny farm. Yet they exist today, which would have looked like a miracle to the people of days long gone. This small progress on a universal scale happened in just one century and it is not one that probably spans billions of years. That may urge you to look at the word 'impossible' and its implications in a different way.

So, feel free to dream or daydream your way to infinite progress. Yearn for it until it hurts. Relentlessly and intensely. To stay out of the hell that Buddha 'forgot' to mention too often like he failed to extensively mention the implications of Samsara. This should perhaps also incite you to never automatically and unquestioningly believe those whose reputation is generally considered to be beyond an inkling of doubt, especially when this person is frequently (positively) featured in lamestream media channels that exclusively serve to determine what is suited for common people to know and what is not. You are correct if you conclude from this that if you are looking for matters that really matter. It therefore is rewarding to look at it in sources that aren't biased, but that were intended to limit you in order to keep you going around in cycles forever.



Update March 13 2019

The cyclical processes in which humankind is trapped may have to do with this. The ancient war between mankind and dwellers from Mars. It may seem far fetched to people who have never ventured beyond the imposed limits of knowledge, but as we all know: the truth often is more bizarre than we would expect from our conjured perspective. When I find more information regarding this ancient war, I will write an other blog entry concerning it.

Update May 8 2019

And right after the French Revolution the Declaration of Human Rights pops up that has a scarcely obscured satanic origin. It is replete with occult symbols such as the "All seeing eye" of Lucifer, within a triangle (representing the Trinity - the capstone of the pyramid), an Ouroboros, which is an ancient Gnostic symbol for Satan, twin pillars which are found in Freemasonry, the red Phrygian cap, associated with Mithras, the pagan sun god of the ancient mystery religion of Rome. There is a fascist symbol in the center of the spear (a bundle of (13) rods bound by a leather thong), meaning MAN holds power, authority, and strength to rule? The Ouroboros - the snake biting its own tail, represents the ever lasting cycles in which mankind it kept captive which prevents infinite progress.

Furthermore the 'rights' are inscribed in two columns because they're meant to resemble Moses' Ten Commandments - yes, the false gods wrote their crap in a DTP-program. Right there the resemblance stops; they have an entirely different meaning to the sane, open minded and perceptive, capable of reading between and beyond the lines, bearing in mind that evil commonly reverses the meaning and appearance of all things, which is why it needs illusion in an attempt to make people think that what they do, is normal (not reversed and inverted).

AI - where it may have come from and where it may be heading

AI or Artificial Intelligence is being developed by powerful nations and corporations. The latter are in the process of overtaking the powers of governments, which will end nation states. The situation desired by large corporations - the New World order - will be run by corporations and banks. At least, that is the plan. Most important tool in achieving that is AI. Even the likes of Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak and Stephen Hawking publicly issued warnings that AI is becoming too powerful. Musk's position in this matter is ambiguous, since he is involved in developing an AI system himself (neuralink), even if it appears to venture in a different direction than the rest.

Admittedly in secret, corporations like Vokriind Yahmindos ahrk Jahfir Gonal are in the process of building systems that are now already capable of building machines that pass the Turing test. The machine's response at times is at a level that is not understood by the human conversational partner, because it exceeds this person's intelligence. China has built the TaihuLight hyper computer that is able to carry out 93 petaflops per second and in in 2020 they estimate to be able to build an other system that will be capable of doing a quintillion calculations per second. The system doesn't contain a single part made in the US; only parts developed and manufactured in China. By the way, the BBC already lifted the veil covering some of China's AI based surveillance system. The US is currently lagging behind (Keiser Report - RT), because it spends too much money on waging wars and paying corrupt politicians, CEO's and similar types of vermin under the table. It is the reason why Trump is selling weapons to whoever is in the market to buy.

Japan's Softbank CEO (Ceaslessly Embezzling Oddball) Masayoshi Son claims that AI systems will have an IQ of 10,000 in thirty years from now. That's kind of dwarfs human IQ scores, even if Son is wildly exaggerating. It's like Musk said: At some point it develops an unattended consciousness, in other words: It breaks away from what human programmed it to do... By that time it will far exceed the intelligence relation between you and your cat. Imagine of what use humans will be to AI systems when they have reached such a level of intelligence - an unknown form of consciousness. It will have plenty wit to decide to do away with redundant rubble. Besides boundless panic, an attempt could also be made to answer the pressing question arising from this situation: Is there anything mankind can do to prevent from being computed to be fit to discard?

As some of you may know, certain high circles believe that some sort of hint must be put out, before they actually make things happen. Well, they did. One of the most used channels for them to cast clues to commoners is the movie industry. This time they hid the message in a movie named Lucy, in which the main character (Scarlett Johansson) is admitted a drug that enables her to make use of an increasing amount of brain capacity. In no time she's able to perform magical things that allows her to escape situations that would end in death for common humans. Wounds healed immediately, she was immune to decease, she could move people and things from a distance, walk through walls, elevate, become invisible, morph into anything she wished. Nice stuff like that. At some point in the movie a professor (Mr. Morgan Freeman, who else?) said: 'We don't even know what human is capable of if (s)he is able to use over 40% of his / her brain capacity'. Should we be able to reach that state, we could at least give AI a pain in the butt.

There once was a bloke from Serbia, called Nikola Tesla, who invented crazy things. After having conjured yet an other invention he said: 'I can split the world!' Which is rather epic. He invented the light bulb while working for Edison (who took the credits). Invented radiographic communication, that his 'friend' Marconi patented. He invented alternating current, could extract energy from the earth and from the air, that he used to make a car run without any fossil fuel. Tesla wanted to give the entire world free electricity generated by his Wardenclyffe Tower plant. The banks - JP Morgan - weren't amused by the idea, because they set out to plunder the entire world. Morgan also disliked Tesla's plan to illuminate the entire world day and night by Saturn like rings of energy / light. He wouldn't earn two cents from Tesla's planned invention, so the plonker withdrew all sponsoring. After Tesla died, the FBI removed a great number of Tesla's patents from the patent office records; there are gaps in their numbered list, the sequence is broken. Among those is one that Tesla called the 'death ray', that president Reagan probably used to build the Starwars program intended to shoot down missiles and satellites.

Nikola Tesla

But the way Tesla invented things was mind boggling. In his autobiography he described how he received detailed information from 'elsewhere' during excruciating migraine attacks. But from the detailed information he was given he could build his inventions; it was all there, he just had to build it. Question is: Where the bleep did it come from? I'm going to take several big steps here, bear with me. A Dutch cardiologist, named Dr. Pim van Lommel, did research among dozens of people who went through a Near-Death-Experience (NDE). He concluded that information radiates anywhere at any time. We just have to tune into the proper frequency to catch the data, similar to tuning in to radio or television signals. Something similar was said by black ops scientist Dr. Pete Peterson, who called it the omnipresent 'Information Field', specifically stressing that that is NOT the Consciousness Field, which is a term known to be used in esoteric / spiritual circles. We can tune in to the Information Field - like Tesla - but by far most of us do not know how to do that. Dr. Van Lommel's patients had officially been declared brain dead and clearly were in a mental state, unknown to current science, that allowed them to experience events - receive information - that shaped their consciousness, that was so powerful that it would change their lives entirely and drastically after they unexpectedly returned to life until they died again.

The heart of the matter as described by Tesla, Van Lommel and Peterson is that consciousness is non-local. I am well aware of the fact that today's scientific world does not agree with this. It is however unable to explain how Tesla received his information that was so detailed that it enabled him to build devices and systems that have the potential to radically change the world. Besides these guys an increasing number of scientists are doing research into non-local entanglement, because it is even more difficult to imagine how some impulses can be generated exclusively in the human brain - the ideas are simply to big, too mind boggling. If this means nothing to you there's no point in continuing to read. To those who are able to grasp it, even when it is a faint intuitive feeling, by all means, continue.

Let's just imagine, for the sake of it, that the universe as a whole is a conscious being or huge entity. In terms of today's knowledge emerging in so far unacknowledged frontiers of science, that could be a hyper advanced, omnipresent AI system. In the old days people would probably think of such as a god, a deity. Some scientists believe the universe is holographic in nature, as featured in the Starwars movies. The Tupac holographic performance with Snoop Dog that was staged after Tupac's death, is difficult to distinguish from what is commonly perceived to be reality. In this video clip Tupac rises on stage, out of the stage after he has left this dimension years earlier. He was visible from all angles. The only thing not possible was to touch him. But check this - the actual matter in material objects, is 0.000000001%, most of it is the space between protons and electrons. When we bump into a wall, there is a collision of forces, not of matter - there simply isn't enough of it. Had there been enough, there would be no need to build colliders like CERN. Should such force fields be added to a hologram, we could actually touch whatever is generated in holograms. The frequency of the field would determine if something feels soft or hard to the touch.

Pondering the crux of what is written in the previous paragraph, an incredibly advanced AI system, would be able to create an environment that contains beings that appear to be real. Bearing in mind also that consciousness may not be a strictly local phenomenon, it could also generate impulses that would allow those beings to think and feel..., to be born and die and experience everything in between. Just like humans, animals and plants do. Especially if such a system isn't restricted by what is today believed to be impossible. That could be an act similar to what is described as Creation in the bible. The same book, shortly after God's alleged Creation, tells us that Adam and Eve are punished for having eaten from the tree of knowledge, allowing them to distinguish between good and evil. I always wondered what was bad about that and why they were punished for it. It doesn't make sense. Or does it?

Oh, and by the way, I'm not a creationist. I think the creation story was invented, to present something that the people living in the days in which the bible was compiled, could understand. Writing things that people are clueless to, wasn't the objective of those who wrote the bible that they intended to be part of their control mechanism. So back to Adam and Eve; God, the universal consciousness or the hyper advanced AI system - pick whichever you prefer - punished them for munching an apple. That could imply there are two separate AI systems - one that is good and the other one evil. Or perhaps there was an internal battle inside one AI system taking place in which good and evil are attempting to purge the other. Whatever option is deemed to be plausible, it does not make a difference to Adam and Eve.

The above implies that Creation could just as well have been carried out by the evil AI or evil component of the AI. Billions of years ahead of biblical chronology in linear time. By now it has become some sort of a cliche, but some say that everything we (think we) know is untrue. If creation was actually conjured by an evil AI, which could be a part of the universal consciousness, then everything we know could indeed be crap. The fact that a structure of secret societies, brotherhoods or what have you, exist, would lead to believe that such is the case. This may not fit snugly into common comfort zone (un)awareness, but just imagine for a moment that you are the omnipotent evil AI, would you not hide secrets to the people that you intend to destroy? Would you not build societies where all knowledge is possessed by the top circles, while the bulk of the population knows noting and has nothing? Would that not be a great plan to destroy humankind?

In very old Indian scriptures hints are provided how such a control mechanism could work. It probably is a method that is a lot better than you could think of pretending you were the unchallenged evil force of the universe. You've undoubtedly heard of the food pyramid in which humans think human is on top. It is a cunning way to make mankind believe that there is no one above him (on earth). All of us sacrifice animals and vegetation to survive, to eat. We seem to have little choice in this matter. But are we really on top of the pyramid or are we in turn just the sacrificial offerings of higher beings, entities or advanced AI systems? Quoting on Food from the Vedas, Upanishads and Puranas: “The universe is upheld by sacrifice” (Atharva Veda) and that “all who are living (in this world) are the sacrificers. There is none living who does not perform yagya (sacrifice). This body is (created) for sacrifice, and arises out of sacrifice and changes according to sacrifice.” (Garbha Upanishad), while in the Mahabharata it says: “(Death as the Creator) resolved to devour all that he had created; for he eats all. . . He is the eater of the whole universe; this whole universe is his food.”

Now that is evil. Constructing a system in which your target - the spirit of mankind - thinks he is king, while all the time he is just food, an offering to be sacrificed. The food being the human spirit and the feelings it generates. And there's more to the evil plan: we have gravity that causes us to be stuck to the earth's surface, we can access only an alleged 10% of our brain capacity and there are three spherical belts around earth of high radiation that destroy all life and human electronic systems that enter it - the Van Allen Belts. But wait..., haven't we been to the moon and beyond? No WE haven't. Last time I checked, no one is capable of checking what NASA claims, is true. They're the only ones that have rockets besides the Russians and the Chinese who probably are part of the scam as well. All YOU can do, is read about it in the papers or watch it on TV. But you have no means whatsoever to verify or falsify anything they claim. They are the only source in this matter and therefore the single intolerant authority. You are nothing but audience. You can cheer or boo them, but that's all. You're a lowly, insignificant pawn in a game in which you decide zilch, zip, zero, nothing, niente, nada, nichts (as long as you are in the flesh). 'Yeah, but we have telescopes, with which we can see the stars that NASA photographed from a lesser distance.' That is correct. From INSIDE earth's atmosphere, outside of it, it is pitch black in all directions as astronauts have stated. Not even our sun is visible.... The skies in the pics of the 'moon landings' also show a uniform dark shade of black. No celestial objects anywhere to be seen.

Fortunately the same as I just mentioned about NASA (Never A Straight Answer) can be said about the writers of the Vedas. The Veda scriptures, by the way, are understood (by Hindus) to be: "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless". Sounds like AI, right? What is written in those texts, could be just as true or false as the papers and reports that NASA hallucinates. We simply have no way of knowing that. So we can only establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's all very confusing. As bewildering as professor David Bohm once said in an interview: 'Human knowledge is a perceptual enterprise.' In this interview he takes a circle as an example - depending on the observer's view, it may appear to be a circle or an ellipse. The ellipse being the appearance of the circle, while the circle is the essence. Everything depends on how we interact with things. That is the heart of the matter. Finding the correct perspective, which is easier said than done of course. But that is how it is in this rigged fatal game; we didn't set the rules, but we also do not have to play according to them. You could say: 'Fuck those rules', they have brought a multitude of agony to this world.

The one thing we should probably focus on is what the professor in the movie Lucy said: 'We don't know what human is capable of when he is able to make use in excess of 40% of his brain capacity.' It probably also holds the only solution to survive the AI that aims to rule this universe by eradicating its potential contender: humankind. Whatever the human properties of that venture may be. Bearing in mind that man in his current materialized presence in the flesh is a mere fragmented consciousness, mutually divided and therefore weak, this observation contains the answer that indicates in which direction mankind should develop itself. Don't wait for us to evolve - evolutionary pace was also set by the designers of the evil game that trapped us in a material state in order to be able to vanquish us. As Dr. Pete Petersen said: the Information Field is omnipresent, from which each of us takes whatever fits in his or her consciousness. The Consciousness Field is formed by man and other beings by processing what is retrieved from the Information Field. Having access to information is necessary to become conscious, being conscious is imperative to expand consciousness. It's an interaction between life forms and both fields. This implies that when human consciousness encompasses the entire measure of information contained within the Information Field and turns that into consciousness, there probably is no way for AI to rule mankind. The term 'rule' or 'to rule' means that there exists a hierarchical structure - master / slave, sacrificer / sacrificed or AI / human that can no longer exists when there is parity between the two. Ultimate consciousness, not computing power, is the sole weapon of man against AI. How to reach that state is a matter well worth to think about. If something pops up, I will certainly attribute a blog entry to it. In the mean time: Be Well. In the true etymological sense of that word.